Congo vs Lebanon: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Congo
- Lebanon
How they compare
Congo currently reports 4,344 t against 3,834 t in Lebanon, a difference of 510 t.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Lebanon's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lebanon ahead.
Congo ranks 145th and Lebanon ranks 147th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Lebanon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,817 t | 2,768 t | 950.65 t | Lebanon |
| 1970s | 1,979 t | 3,335 t | 1,356 t | Lebanon |
| 1980s | 2,553 t | 2,669 t | 115.93 t | Lebanon |
| 1990s | 2,992 t | 4,373 t | 1,382 t | Lebanon |
| 2000s | 3,398 t | 4,218 t | 819.67 t | Lebanon |
| 2010s | 3,939 t | 4,239 t | 300.04 t | Lebanon |
| 2020s | 4,258 t | 4,056 t | 201.68 t | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Congo or Lebanon?
- Congo, at 4,344 t against 3,834 t in Lebanon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Congo and Lebanon?
- 510 t, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Lebanon?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Congo and Lebanon rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Congo ranks 145th and Lebanon ranks 147th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).