Cuba vs Serbia, Republic of: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Cuba
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 60,143 t against 56,596 t in Serbia, Republic of, a difference of 3,547 t.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Serbia, Republic of's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 78th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 80th of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Serbia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 63,817 t | 57,895 t | 5,922 t | Cuba |
| 2010s | 66,203 t | 63,557 t | 2,646 t | Cuba |
| 2020s | 58,275 t | 56,968 t | 1,308 t | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Cuba or Serbia, Republic of?
- Cuba, at 60,143 t against 56,596 t in Serbia, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Cuba and Serbia, Republic of?
- 3,547 t, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Serbia, Republic of?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Cuba ranks 78th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 80th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).