Czechia vs Hungary: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Czechia
- Hungary
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 232,453 t against 194,450 t in Hungary, a difference of 38,003 t.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.2 times Hungary's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Czechia has been ahead every year.
Czechia ranks 35th and Hungary ranks 37th of 185 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 234,934 t | 139,724 t | 95,210 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 183,793 t | 135,045 t | 48,748 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 188,139 t | 150,571 t | 37,568 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 224,580 t | 167,958 t | 56,622 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Czechia or Hungary?
- Czechia, at 232,453 t against 194,450 t in Hungary as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Czechia and Hungary?
- 38,003 t, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Hungary?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czechia and Hungary rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Czechia ranks 35th and Hungary ranks 37th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).