Czech Republic vs Mali: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Czech Republic
- Mali
How they compare
Mali currently reports 254,664 t against 232,453 t in Czech Republic, a difference of 22,211 t.
That makes Mali's figure about 1.1 times Czech Republic's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czech Republic ahead.
Czech Republic ranks 35th and Mali ranks 33rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czech Republic averaged higher in 2 and Mali in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czech Republic | Mali | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 234,934 t | 82,334 t | 152,600 t | Czech Republic |
| 2000s | 183,793 t | 125,464 t | 58,328 t | Czech Republic |
| 2010s | 188,139 t | 206,019 t | 17,880 t | Mali |
| 2020s | 224,580 t | 247,195 t | 22,615 t | Mali |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Czech Republic or Mali?
- Mali, at 254,664 t against 232,453 t in Czech Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Czech Republic and Mali?
- 22,211 t, with Mali ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czech Republic and Mali?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Czech Republic and Mali rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Czech Republic ranks 35th and Mali ranks 33rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).