Czechia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium

Czechia
232,453 t
in 2023
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
249,912 t
in 2023
Czechia rank
35th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
34th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Czechia
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
200.0k300.0k400.0k500.0k600.0k196119922023

How they compare

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland currently reports 249,912 t against 232,453 t in Czechia, a difference of 17,459 t.

That makes United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

Across all 31 years both countries report, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has been ahead every year.

Czechia ranks 35th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 34th of 186 countries.

United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Czechia United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s 234,934 t 534,911 t 299,976 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2000s 183,793 t 473,875 t 290,083 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2010s 188,139 t 376,858 t 188,719 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
2020s 224,580 t 269,736 t 45,156 t United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Czechia or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, at 249,912 t against 232,453 t in Czechia as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Czechia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
17,459 t, with United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Czechia and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
Czechia ranks 35th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 34th of 186 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Czechia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/czechia/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/czechia/united-kingdom-of-great-britain-and-northern-ireland/">Czechia vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).