Czechoslovakia vs South Africa: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Czechoslovakia
- South Africa
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 390,350 t against 367,089 t in Czechoslovakia, a difference of 23,261 t.
That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Czechoslovakia's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Czechoslovakia has been ahead every year.
Czechoslovakia ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 24th of 186 countries.
Czechoslovakia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechoslovakia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 301,394 t | 73,204 t | 228,189 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1970s | 392,485 t | 101,871 t | 290,615 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1980s | 442,842 t | 113,613 t | 329,229 t | Czechoslovakia |
| 1990s | 433,337 t | 104,852 t | 328,485 t | Czechoslovakia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Czechoslovakia or South Africa?
- South Africa, at 390,350 t against 367,089 t in Czechoslovakia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Czechoslovakia and South Africa?
- 23,261 t, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechoslovakia and South Africa?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Czechoslovakia and South Africa rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Czechoslovakia ranks 25th and South Africa ranks 24th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).