Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Republic of Moldova: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
72,034 t
in 2023
Republic of Moldova
95,531 t
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
12th
Republic of Moldova rank
10th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • Republic of Moldova
40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k120.0k196119922023

How they compare

Republic of Moldova currently reports 95,531 t against 72,034 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 23,497 t.

That makes Republic of Moldova's figure about 1.3 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Democratic People's Republic of Korea ahead.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 12th and Republic of Moldova ranks 10th of 18 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Democratic People's Republic of Korea averaged higher in 3 and Republic of Moldova in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea Republic of Moldova Difference Ahead
1990s 77,493 t 68,110 t 9,382 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2000s 69,723 t 63,027 t 6,696 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2010s 81,664 t 74,472 t 7,193 t Democratic People's Republic of Korea
2020s 73,660 t 85,339 t 11,679 t Republic of Moldova

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or Republic of Moldova?
Republic of Moldova, at 95,531 t against 72,034 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Republic of Moldova?
23,497 t, with Republic of Moldova ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Republic of Moldova?
32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and Republic of Moldova rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 12th and Republic of Moldova ranks 10th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Republic of Moldova: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/republic-of-moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/republic-of-moldova/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs Republic of Moldova: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).