Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs United States of America: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium

Democratic People's Republic of Korea
72,034 t
in 2023
United States of America
3.80 million t
in 2023
Democratic People's Republic of Korea rank
12th
United States of America rank
12th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Democratic People's Republic of Korea
  • United States of America
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

United States of America currently reports 3.80 million t against 72,034 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea, a difference of 3.73 million t.

That makes United States of America's figure about 52.8 times Democratic People's Republic of Korea's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, United States of America has been ahead every year.

Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 12th of 18 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic People's Republic of Korea United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 52,700 t 3.06 million t 3.00 million t United States of America
1970s 66,540 t 3.41 million t 3.34 million t United States of America
1980s 74,853 t 3.37 million t 3.30 million t United States of America
1990s 80,371 t 3.22 million t 3.14 million t United States of America
2000s 69,723 t 2.81 million t 2.74 million t United States of America
2010s 81,664 t 2.97 million t 2.88 million t United States of America
2020s 73,660 t 3.55 million t 3.48 million t United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Democratic People's Republic of Korea or United States of America?
United States of America, at 3.80 million t against 72,034 t in Democratic People's Republic of Korea as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Democratic People's Republic of Korea and United States of America?
3.73 million t, with United States of America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic People's Republic of Korea and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic People's Republic of Korea and United States of America rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
Democratic People's Republic of Korea ranks 12th and United States of America ranks 12th of 18 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs United States of America: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/united-states-of-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/democratic-people-s-republic-of-korea/united-states-of-america/">Democratic People's Republic of Korea vs United States of America: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).