Dominica vs Montenegro: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Dominica
- Montenegro
How they compare
Dominica currently reports 154.72 t against 131.16 t in Montenegro, a difference of 23.56 t.
That makes Dominica's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Dominica ranks 162nd and Montenegro ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Dominica averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominica | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 218.96 t | 1,438 t | 1,219 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 179.21 t | 535.82 t | 356.61 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 154.57 t | 127.08 t | 27.49 t | Dominica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Dominica or Montenegro?
- Dominica, at 154.72 t against 131.16 t in Montenegro as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Dominica and Montenegro?
- 23.56 t, with Dominica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominica and Montenegro?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Dominica and Montenegro rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Dominica ranks 162nd and Montenegro ranks 163rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).