Eastern Asia vs USSR: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Eastern Asia
- USSR
How they compare
Eastern Asia currently reports 7.20 million t against 6.59 million t in USSR, a difference of 604,200 t.
That makes Eastern Asia's figure about 1.1 times USSR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, USSR has been ahead every year.
Eastern Asia ranks 6th and USSR ranks 4th of 29 groups.
USSR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eastern Asia | USSR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.17 million t | 5.07 million t | 1.90 million t | USSR |
| 1970s | 4.00 million t | 6.46 million t | 2.46 million t | USSR |
| 1980s | 5.38 million t | 6.80 million t | 1.43 million t | USSR |
| 1990s | 6.12 million t | 7.59 million t | 1.47 million t | USSR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Eastern Asia or USSR?
- Eastern Asia, at 7.20 million t against 6.59 million t in USSR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Eastern Asia and USSR?
- 604,200 t, with Eastern Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Asia and USSR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Eastern Asia and USSR rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Eastern Asia ranks 6th and USSR ranks 4th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).