Ecuador vs Sri Lanka: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ecuador
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 83,306 t against 82,124 t in Ecuador, a difference of 1,182 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 41,840 t | 7,894 t | 33,946 t | Ecuador |
| 1970s | 40,572 t | 10,559 t | 30,013 t | Ecuador |
| 1980s | 38,932 t | 14,239 t | 24,693 t | Ecuador |
| 1990s | 51,728 t | 16,597 t | 35,131 t | Ecuador |
| 2000s | 50,008 t | 28,488 t | 21,520 t | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 60,450 t | 55,363 t | 5,087 t | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 74,176 t | 77,832 t | 3,656 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Ecuador or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 83,306 t against 82,124 t in Ecuador as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 1,182 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ecuador and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Ecuador ranks 71st and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).