Egypt vs Micronesia (Federated States of): Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Egypt
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 443,827 t against 2.58 t in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 443,824 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Egypt has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 21st and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 186 countries.
Egypt has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Micronesia (Federated States of) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 286,827 t | 11.49 t | 286,816 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 380,589 t | 3.21 t | 380,586 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 405,058 t | 2.51 t | 405,055 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 435,284 t | 2.54 t | 435,281 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Egypt or Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- Egypt, at 443,827 t against 2.58 t in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Egypt and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- 443,824 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Micronesia (Federated States of)?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Micronesia (Federated States of) rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Egypt ranks 21st and Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).