Egypt vs Myanmar: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Egypt
- Myanmar
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 443,827 t against 436,360 t in Myanmar, a difference of 7,467 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Myanmar ahead.
Egypt ranks 21st and Myanmar ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 6 and Myanmar in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 181,801 t | 151,378 t | 30,423 t | Egypt |
| 1970s | 197,970 t | 161,095 t | 36,874 t | Egypt |
| 1980s | 177,408 t | 236,513 t | 59,106 t | Myanmar |
| 1990s | 279,788 t | 225,973 t | 53,815 t | Egypt |
| 2000s | 380,589 t | 291,673 t | 88,916 t | Egypt |
| 2010s | 405,058 t | 374,293 t | 30,765 t | Egypt |
| 2020s | 435,284 t | 426,838 t | 8,446 t | Egypt |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Egypt or Myanmar?
- Egypt, at 443,827 t against 436,360 t in Myanmar as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Egypt and Myanmar?
- 7,467 t, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Myanmar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Myanmar rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Egypt ranks 21st and Myanmar ranks 22nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).