Egypt vs Thailand: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Egypt
- Thailand
How they compare
Thailand currently reports 507,307 t against 443,827 t in Egypt, a difference of 63,480 t.
That makes Thailand's figure about 1.1 times Egypt's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.
Egypt ranks 21st and Thailand ranks 19th of 186 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 181,801 t | 257,951 t | 76,150 t | Thailand |
| 1970s | 197,970 t | 293,659 t | 95,690 t | Thailand |
| 1980s | 177,408 t | 313,525 t | 136,117 t | Thailand |
| 1990s | 279,788 t | 350,743 t | 70,955 t | Thailand |
| 2000s | 380,589 t | 488,758 t | 108,169 t | Thailand |
| 2010s | 405,058 t | 528,551 t | 123,493 t | Thailand |
| 2020s | 435,284 t | 507,376 t | 72,092 t | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Egypt or Thailand?
- Thailand, at 507,307 t against 443,827 t in Egypt as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Egypt and Thailand?
- 63,480 t, with Thailand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Thailand?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Egypt and Thailand rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Egypt ranks 21st and Thailand ranks 19th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).