Estonia, Republic of vs Panama: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Estonia, Republic of
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 10,391 t against 10,153 t in Estonia, Republic of, a difference of 238 t.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Estonia, Republic of ahead.
Estonia, Republic of ranks 118th and Panama ranks 117th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia, Republic of averaged higher in 2 and Panama in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia, Republic of | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 12,901 t | 11,708 t | 1,193 t | Estonia, Republic of |
| 2000s | 5,035 t | 11,076 t | 6,041 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 5,149 t | 10,093 t | 4,943 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 10,399 t | 10,252 t | 147.11 t | Estonia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Estonia, Republic of or Panama?
- Panama, at 10,391 t against 10,153 t in Estonia, Republic of as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Estonia, Republic of and Panama?
- 238 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia, Republic of and Panama?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Estonia, Republic of and Panama rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Estonia, Republic of ranks 118th and Panama ranks 117th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).