Ethiopia PDR vs Japan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Japan
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 155,444 t against 145,921 t in Japan, a difference of 9,523 t.
That makes Ethiopia PDR's figure about 1.1 times Japan's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 47th and Japan ranks 49th of 186 countries.
Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Japan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 110,675 t | 457,690 t | 347,014 t | Japan |
| 1970s | 146,324 t | 453,050 t | 306,726 t | Japan |
| 1980s | 181,388 t | 284,896 t | 103,508 t | Japan |
| 1990s | 169,479 t | 208,250 t | 38,770 t | Japan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Ethiopia PDR or Japan?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 155,444 t against 145,921 t in Japan as of 1992.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Ethiopia PDR and Japan?
- 9,523 t, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Japan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Japan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 47th and Japan ranks 49th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).