Ethiopia vs Mexico: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Mexico
How they compare
Mexico currently reports 951,832 t against 735,742 t in Ethiopia, a difference of 216,090 t.
That makes Mexico's figure about 1.3 times Ethiopia's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 10th of 185 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 160,230 t | 621,419 t | 461,190 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 236,321 t | 729,685 t | 493,364 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 522,788 t | 774,425 t | 251,637 t | Mexico |
| 2020s | 729,494 t | 901,648 t | 172,154 t | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Mexico?
- Mexico, at 951,832 t against 735,742 t in Ethiopia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Mexico?
- 216,090 t, with Mexico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Mexico?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Mexico rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 13th and Mexico ranks 10th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).