Ethiopia vs Nigeria: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ethiopia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Ethiopia currently reports 735,742 t against 613,349 t in Nigeria, a difference of 122,393 t.
That makes Ethiopia's figure about 1.2 times Nigeria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Nigeria ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 13th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 160,230 t | 436,748 t | 276,518 t | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 236,321 t | 599,889 t | 363,568 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 522,788 t | 585,649 t | 62,861 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 729,494 t | 619,108 t | 110,386 t | Ethiopia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Ethiopia or Nigeria?
- Ethiopia, at 735,742 t against 613,349 t in Nigeria as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Ethiopia and Nigeria?
- 122,393 t, with Ethiopia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Nigeria?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Ethiopia and Nigeria rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Ethiopia ranks 13th and Nigeria ranks 16th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).