Finland vs Mozambique: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Finland
- Mozambique
How they compare
Finland currently reports 52,750 t against 52,122 t in Mozambique, a difference of 628 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 83rd and Mozambique ranks 84th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and Mozambique in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 69,374 t | 55.16 t | 69,319 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 79,740 t | 68.83 t | 79,671 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 73,747 t | 46.33 t | 73,701 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 79,054 t | 4,537 t | 74,517 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 78,813 t | 17,474 t | 61,338 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 71,534 t | 43,480 t | 28,053 t | Finland |
| 2020s | 56,102 t | 57,595 t | 1,493 t | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Finland or Mozambique?
- Finland, at 52,750 t against 52,122 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Finland and Mozambique?
- 628 t, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Mozambique?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Finland and Mozambique rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Finland ranks 83rd and Mozambique ranks 84th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).