Ghana vs Senegal: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ghana
- Senegal
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 134,604 t against 109,951 t in Senegal, a difference of 24,653 t.
That makes Ghana's figure about 1.2 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Senegal ahead.
Ghana ranks 55th and Senegal ranks 56th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 3 and Senegal in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12,479 t | 34,159 t | 21,680 t | Senegal |
| 1970s | 15,227 t | 35,095 t | 19,868 t | Senegal |
| 1980s | 20,139 t | 38,820 t | 18,682 t | Senegal |
| 1990s | 35,413 t | 39,651 t | 4,239 t | Senegal |
| 2000s | 49,890 t | 44,019 t | 5,870 t | Ghana |
| 2010s | 85,275 t | 63,354 t | 21,921 t | Ghana |
| 2020s | 122,720 t | 99,644 t | 23,076 t | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Ghana or Senegal?
- Ghana, at 134,604 t against 109,951 t in Senegal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Ghana and Senegal?
- 24,653 t, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Senegal?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ghana and Senegal rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Ghana ranks 55th and Senegal ranks 56th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).