Greece vs Madagascar: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Greece
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 108,327 t against 106,045 t in Greece, a difference of 2,282 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Greece ahead.
Greece ranks 63rd and Madagascar ranks 61st of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Greece averaged higher in 5 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 61,962 t | 19,928 t | 42,034 t | Greece |
| 1970s | 91,016 t | 24,179 t | 66,837 t | Greece |
| 1980s | 101,562 t | 26,683 t | 74,879 t | Greece |
| 1990s | 95,576 t | 39,136 t | 56,440 t | Greece |
| 2000s | 94,656 t | 72,678 t | 21,978 t | Greece |
| 2010s | 87,257 t | 102,944 t | 15,687 t | Madagascar |
| 2020s | 88,825 t | 110,141 t | 21,316 t | Madagascar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Greece or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 108,327 t against 106,045 t in Greece as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Greece and Madagascar?
- 2,282 t, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Madagascar?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Madagascar rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Greece ranks 63rd and Madagascar ranks 61st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).