Greece vs Sweden: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Greece
- Sweden
How they compare
Greece currently reports 106,045 t against 97,333 t in Sweden, a difference of 8,712 t.
That makes Greece's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.
Greece ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Greece | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 61,962 t | 96,217 t | 34,255 t | Sweden |
| 1970s | 91,016 t | 101,927 t | 10,911 t | Sweden |
| 1980s | 101,562 t | 106,706 t | 5,144 t | Sweden |
| 1990s | 95,576 t | 112,912 t | 17,336 t | Sweden |
| 2000s | 94,656 t | 116,132 t | 21,476 t | Sweden |
| 2010s | 87,257 t | 120,353 t | 33,096 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 88,825 t | 119,691 t | 30,865 t | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Greece or Sweden?
- Greece, at 106,045 t against 97,333 t in Sweden as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Greece and Sweden?
- 8,712 t, with Greece ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Sweden?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Greece and Sweden rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Greece ranks 59th and Sweden ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).