Grenada vs Kiribati: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Grenada
- Kiribati
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 48.04 t against 31.15 t in Grenada, a difference of 16.89 t.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 185th and Kiribati ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 5 and Kiribati in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Kiribati | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 220.62 t | 21.59 t | 199.03 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 158.9 t | 31.64 t | 127.25 t | Grenada |
| 1980s | 101.59 t | 29.16 t | 72.44 t | Grenada |
| 1990s | 49.25 t | 32.88 t | 16.38 t | Grenada |
| 2000s | 39.83 t | 39.65 t | 0.1808 t | Grenada |
| 2010s | 43.16 t | 64.71 t | 21.55 t | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 35.41 t | 50.3 t | 14.89 t | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Grenada or Kiribati?
- Kiribati, at 48.04 t against 31.15 t in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Grenada and Kiribati?
- 16.89 t, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Kiribati?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Kiribati rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Grenada ranks 185th and Kiribati ranks 183rd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).