Grenada vs Malta: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Grenada
- Malta
How they compare
Grenada currently reports 31.15 t against 23.41 t in Malta, a difference of 7.74 t.
That makes Grenada's figure about 1.3 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Grenada ranks 185th and Malta ranks 188th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 220.62 t | 153.95 t | 66.67 t | Grenada |
| 1970s | 158.9 t | 172.96 t | 14.07 t | Malta |
| 1980s | 101.59 t | 219.72 t | 118.13 t | Malta |
| 1990s | 49.25 t | 204.07 t | 154.82 t | Malta |
| 2000s | 39.83 t | 237.96 t | 198.13 t | Malta |
| 2010s | 43.16 t | 215.7 t | 172.55 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 35.41 t | 31.28 t | 4.13 t | Grenada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Grenada or Malta?
- Grenada, at 31.15 t against 23.41 t in Malta as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Grenada and Malta?
- 7.74 t, with Grenada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Malta?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Malta rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Grenada ranks 185th and Malta ranks 188th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).