Guatemala vs Lithuania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Guatemala
- Lithuania
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 84,083 t against 83,733 t in Lithuania, a difference of 350 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Guatemala ranks 75th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 201 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9,068 t | 49,703 t | 40,635 t | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 16,601 t | 44,016 t | 27,415 t | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 44,522 t | 69,090 t | 24,567 t | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 78,802 t | 84,741 t | 5,938 t | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Guatemala or Lithuania?
- Guatemala, at 84,083 t against 83,733 t in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 350 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Lithuania?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Lithuania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Guatemala ranks 75th and Lithuania ranks 77th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).