Guatemala vs Sri Lanka: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Guatemala
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Guatemala currently reports 84,083 t against 83,306 t in Sri Lanka, a difference of 777 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Guatemala ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,253 t | 7,894 t | 6,642 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 2,377 t | 10,559 t | 8,183 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 5,374 t | 14,239 t | 8,864 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 8,771 t | 16,597 t | 7,826 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 16,601 t | 28,488 t | 11,887 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 44,522 t | 55,363 t | 10,841 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 78,802 t | 77,832 t | 970.52 t | Guatemala |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Guatemala or Sri Lanka?
- Guatemala, at 84,083 t against 83,306 t in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Guatemala and Sri Lanka?
- 777 t, with Guatemala ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guatemala and Sri Lanka rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Guatemala ranks 67th and Sri Lanka ranks 70th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).