Guinea vs Rwanda: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Guinea
- Rwanda
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 43,308 t against 42,389 t in Rwanda, a difference of 919 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 201 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22,140 t | 23,857 t | 1,717 t | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 24,346 t | 31,521 t | 7,175 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 29,114 t | 39,129 t | 10,015 t | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 31,553 t | 35,127 t | 3,574 t | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 33,260 t | 40,649 t | 7,389 t | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 37,098 t | 43,551 t | 6,453 t | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 39,987 t | 42,911 t | 2,923 t | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Guinea or Rwanda?
- Guinea, at 43,308 t against 42,389 t in Rwanda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Guinea and Rwanda?
- 919 t, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guinea and Rwanda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Guinea ranks 99th and Rwanda ranks 100th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).