Guyana vs Israel: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Guyana
- Israel
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 7,095 t against 6,186 t in Israel, a difference of 909 t.
That makes Guyana's figure about 1.1 times Israel's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Israel ahead.
Guyana ranks 124th and Israel ranks 127th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Guyana averaged higher in 1 and Israel in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guyana | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,722 t | 7,350 t | 5,627 t | Israel |
| 1970s | 1,840 t | 9,975 t | 8,136 t | Israel |
| 1980s | 2,199 t | 11,520 t | 9,321 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 2,582 t | 9,877 t | 7,295 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 2,933 t | 8,011 t | 5,078 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 4,854 t | 7,910 t | 3,056 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 6,807 t | 5,867 t | 939.66 t | Guyana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Guyana or Israel?
- Guyana, at 7,095 t against 6,186 t in Israel as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Guyana and Israel?
- 909 t, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guyana and Israel?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guyana and Israel rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Guyana ranks 124th and Israel ranks 127th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).