Honduras vs Mauritania: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Honduras
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 12,738 t against 12,056 t in Honduras, a difference of 682 t.
That makes Mauritania's figure about 1.1 times Honduras's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Honduras ranks 111th and Mauritania ranks 110th of 186 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 10,145 t | 1,804 t | 8,342 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 13,776 t | 1,213 t | 12,563 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 22,360 t | 2,997 t | 19,364 t | Honduras |
| 1990s | 22,301 t | 5,119 t | 17,182 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 10,303 t | 4,684 t | 5,619 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 10,148 t | 8,187 t | 1,961 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 11,526 t | 11,133 t | 393.57 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Honduras or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 12,738 t against 12,056 t in Honduras as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Honduras and Mauritania?
- 682 t, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mauritania?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Honduras and Mauritania rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Honduras ranks 111th and Mauritania ranks 110th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).