Iceland vs Suriname: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Iceland
- Suriname
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2,433 t against 2,091 t in Suriname, a difference of 342 t.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.
Iceland ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 146th of 186 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Suriname in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,000 t | 895.26 t | 105.12 t | Iceland |
| 1970s | 737.72 t | 1,318 t | 580.59 t | Suriname |
| 1980s | 1,088 t | 1,815 t | 727.47 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 966.81 t | 1,986 t | 1,019 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 1,234 t | 1,947 t | 712.31 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 2,063 t | 2,782 t | 719.25 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 3,174 t | 2,270 t | 904.32 t | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Iceland or Suriname?
- Iceland, at 2,433 t against 2,091 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Iceland and Suriname?
- 342 t, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Suriname?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Iceland and Suriname rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Iceland ranks 144th and Suriname ranks 146th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).