Ireland vs Rwanda: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Ireland
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 42,389 t against 38,307 t in Ireland, a difference of 4,082 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Ireland's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ireland ahead.
Ireland ranks 91st and Rwanda ranks 89th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 4 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24,181 t | 23,857 t | 324.36 t | Ireland |
| 1970s | 23,346 t | 31,521 t | 8,175 t | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 31,175 t | 39,129 t | 7,954 t | Rwanda |
| 1990s | 34,225 t | 35,127 t | 901.97 t | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 47,464 t | 40,649 t | 6,815 t | Ireland |
| 2010s | 46,991 t | 43,551 t | 3,440 t | Ireland |
| 2020s | 44,136 t | 42,911 t | 1,226 t | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Ireland or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 42,389 t against 38,307 t in Ireland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Ireland and Rwanda?
- 4,082 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Rwanda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Ireland and Rwanda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Ireland ranks 91st and Rwanda ranks 89th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).