Israel vs Jordan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Israel
- Jordan
How they compare
Israel currently reports 6,186 t against 4,533 t in Jordan, a difference of 1,653 t.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.4 times Jordan's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 127th and Jordan ranks 130th of 185 countries.
Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Jordan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7,350 t | 2,017 t | 5,333 t | Israel |
| 1970s | 9,975 t | 1,784 t | 8,191 t | Israel |
| 1980s | 11,520 t | 2,613 t | 8,907 t | Israel |
| 1990s | 9,877 t | 2,726 t | 7,151 t | Israel |
| 2000s | 8,011 t | 2,692 t | 5,319 t | Israel |
| 2010s | 7,910 t | 3,734 t | 4,176 t | Israel |
| 2020s | 5,867 t | 4,383 t | 1,484 t | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Israel or Jordan?
- Israel, at 6,186 t against 4,533 t in Jordan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Israel and Jordan?
- 1,653 t, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Jordan?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Israel and Jordan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Israel ranks 127th and Jordan ranks 130th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).