Jamaica vs Namibia: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Jamaica
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3,599 t against 3,340 t in Jamaica, a difference of 259 t.
That makes Namibia's figure about 1.1 times Jamaica's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jamaica ahead.
Jamaica ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 149th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4,287 t | 2,141 t | 2,147 t | Jamaica |
| 1970s | 3,739 t | 2,113 t | 1,626 t | Jamaica |
| 1980s | 3,035 t | 2,509 t | 525.18 t | Jamaica |
| 1990s | 3,349 t | 2,622 t | 727.14 t | Jamaica |
| 2000s | 2,587 t | 3,381 t | 794.16 t | Namibia |
| 2010s | 2,676 t | 3,358 t | 681.94 t | Namibia |
| 2020s | 3,139 t | 3,885 t | 745.74 t | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Jamaica or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 3,599 t against 3,340 t in Jamaica as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Jamaica and Namibia?
- 259 t, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Namibia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Jamaica and Namibia rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Jamaica ranks 152nd and Namibia ranks 149th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).