Kenya vs Slovak Republic: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Kenya
- Slovak Republic
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 148,529 t against 143,677 t in Slovak Republic, a difference of 4,852 t.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Slovak Republic ahead.
Kenya ranks 48th and Slovak Republic ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 3 and Slovak Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Slovak Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 79,391 t | 104,941 t | 25,549 t | Slovak Republic |
| 2000s | 85,274 t | 77,347 t | 7,926 t | Kenya |
| 2010s | 114,544 t | 96,627 t | 17,917 t | Kenya |
| 2020s | 136,017 t | 128,382 t | 7,635 t | Kenya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Kenya or Slovak Republic?
- Kenya, at 148,529 t against 143,677 t in Slovak Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Kenya and Slovak Republic?
- 4,852 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Slovak Republic?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Slovak Republic rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Kenya ranks 48th and Slovak Republic ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).