Kenya vs Uganda: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Kenya
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 168,692 t against 148,529 t in Kenya, a difference of 20,163 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kenya ahead.
Kenya ranks 51st and Uganda ranks 48th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kenya averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kenya | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 45,360 t | 41,001 t | 4,360 t | Kenya |
| 1970s | 52,491 t | 68,408 t | 15,918 t | Uganda |
| 1980s | 72,957 t | 103,883 t | 30,926 t | Uganda |
| 1990s | 80,865 t | 124,309 t | 43,445 t | Uganda |
| 2000s | 85,274 t | 133,132 t | 47,858 t | Uganda |
| 2010s | 114,544 t | 133,975 t | 19,432 t | Uganda |
| 2020s | 136,017 t | 166,491 t | 30,474 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Kenya or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 168,692 t against 148,529 t in Kenya as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Kenya and Uganda?
- 20,163 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kenya and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kenya and Uganda rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Kenya ranks 51st and Uganda ranks 48th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).