Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
3.68 million t
in 2023
Poland
682,413 t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
15th
Poland rank
15th

Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Poland
01.0M2.0M3.0M4.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 3.68 million t against 682,413 t in Poland, a difference of 2.99 million t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 5.4 times Poland's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has been ahead every year.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Poland ranks 15th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Poland Difference Ahead
1960s 1.46 million t 623,406 t 833,205 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 1.81 million t 727,657 t 1.08 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 2.02 million t 780,186 t 1.23 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 2.00 million t 722,734 t 1.28 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 2.42 million t 597,454 t 1.82 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 3.19 million t 561,905 t 2.63 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.69 million t 677,130 t 3.02 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Poland?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 3.68 million t against 682,413 t in Poland as of 2023.
What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
2.99 million t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Poland rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 15th and Poland ranks 15th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/crop-residue-removal-cropland-potassium/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/poland/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Poland: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).