Liberia vs Oman: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Liberia
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 6,699 t against 5,548 t in Liberia, a difference of 1,151 t.
That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Liberia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Oman ahead.
Liberia ranks 128th and Oman ranks 125th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Liberia averaged higher in 6 and Oman in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Liberia | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 78.91 t | 198.41 t | 119.5 t | Oman |
| 1970s | 1,544 t | 314.55 t | 1,229 t | Liberia |
| 1980s | 5,138 t | 629.76 t | 4,508 t | Liberia |
| 1990s | 5,447 t | 912.8 t | 4,534 t | Liberia |
| 2000s | 7,999 t | 970.65 t | 7,029 t | Liberia |
| 2010s | 10,471 t | 1,988 t | 8,483 t | Liberia |
| 2020s | 6,372 t | 5,742 t | 629.66 t | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Liberia or Oman?
- Oman, at 6,699 t against 5,548 t in Liberia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Liberia and Oman?
- 1,151 t, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Liberia and Oman?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Liberia and Oman rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Liberia ranks 128th and Oman ranks 125th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).