Malaysia vs Togo: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Malaysia
- Togo
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 36,795 t against 33,295 t in Togo, a difference of 3,500 t.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Togo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Togo ahead.
Malaysia ranks 92nd and Togo ranks 94th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 5 and Togo in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,702 t | 10,423 t | 7,721 t | Togo |
| 1970s | 10,340 t | 15,331 t | 4,991 t | Togo |
| 1980s | 25,883 t | 16,465 t | 9,418 t | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 35,742 t | 22,490 t | 13,252 t | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 33,486 t | 30,273 t | 3,213 t | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 39,659 t | 33,090 t | 6,569 t | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 38,918 t | 33,014 t | 5,904 t | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Malaysia or Togo?
- Malaysia, at 36,795 t against 33,295 t in Togo as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Malaysia and Togo?
- 3,500 t, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Togo?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Malaysia and Togo rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Malaysia ranks 92nd and Togo ranks 94th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).