Maldives vs Seychelles: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Maldives
- Seychelles
How they compare
Maldives currently reports 19.33 t against 13.15 t in Seychelles, a difference of 6.18 t.
That makes Maldives's figure about 1.5 times Seychelles's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Maldives has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 176th and Seychelles ranks 179th of 185 countries.
Maldives has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Seychelles | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 28.46 t | 1.91 t | 26.54 t | Maldives |
| 1970s | 43.94 t | 3.18 t | 40.76 t | Maldives |
| 1980s | 43.33 t | 7.06 t | 36.27 t | Maldives |
| 1990s | 55.36 t | 10.07 t | 45.29 t | Maldives |
| 2000s | 102.45 t | 14.95 t | 87.5 t | Maldives |
| 2010s | 25.41 t | 13.15 t | 12.26 t | Maldives |
| 2020s | 16.21 t | 13.25 t | 2.97 t | Maldives |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Maldives or Seychelles?
- Maldives, at 19.33 t against 13.15 t in Seychelles as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Maldives and Seychelles?
- 6.18 t, with Maldives ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Seychelles?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Maldives and Seychelles rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Maldives ranks 176th and Seychelles ranks 179th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).