Mexico vs Türkiye: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Mexico
- Türkiye
How they compare
Türkiye currently reports 1.05 million t against 951,832 t in Mexico, a difference of 94,918 t.
That makes Türkiye's figure about 1.1 times Mexico's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mexico ahead.
Mexico ranks 10th and Türkiye ranks 15th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Mexico averaged higher in 4 and Türkiye in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mexico | Türkiye | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 254,297 t | 185,128 t | 69,169 t | Mexico |
| 1970s | 326,560 t | 312,549 t | 14,011 t | Mexico |
| 1980s | 483,490 t | 485,291 t | 1,801 t | Türkiye |
| 1990s | 619,762 t | 604,658 t | 15,103 t | Mexico |
| 2000s | 729,685 t | 696,094 t | 33,591 t | Mexico |
| 2010s | 774,425 t | 830,336 t | 55,912 t | Türkiye |
| 2020s | 901,648 t | 934,191 t | 32,543 t | Türkiye |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Mexico or Türkiye?
- Türkiye, at 1.05 million t against 951,832 t in Mexico as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Mexico and Türkiye?
- 94,918 t, with Türkiye ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mexico and Türkiye?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mexico and Türkiye rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Mexico ranks 10th and Türkiye ranks 15th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).