Middle Africa vs Uzbekistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Middle Africa
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 414,728 t against 268,626 t in Middle Africa, a difference of 146,102 t.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.5 times Middle Africa's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Uzbekistan has been ahead every year.
Middle Africa ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 18 regions.
Uzbekistan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Middle Africa | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 102,347 t | 287,648 t | 185,301 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 126,237 t | 344,240 t | 218,003 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 222,277 t | 356,301 t | 134,024 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2020s | 260,758 t | 387,849 t | 127,092 t | Uzbekistan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Middle Africa or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 414,728 t against 268,626 t in Middle Africa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Middle Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 146,102 t, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Middle Africa and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Middle Africa ranks 7th and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).