Montenegro vs Tonga: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Montenegro
- Tonga
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 131.16 t against 101.62 t in Tonga, a difference of 29.54 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.3 times Tonga's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.
Montenegro ranks 176th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,438 t | 71.83 t | 1,366 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 535.82 t | 89.1 t | 446.72 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 127.08 t | 102.07 t | 25.01 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Montenegro or Tonga?
- Montenegro, at 131.16 t against 101.62 t in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Montenegro and Tonga?
- 29.54 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Tonga?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Tonga rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Montenegro ranks 176th and Tonga ranks 178th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).