Montenegro vs Trinidad and Tobago: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Montenegro
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 131.16 t against 90.39 t in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 40.77 t.
That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.5 times Trinidad and Tobago's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 163rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 166th of 186 countries.
Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,438 t | 153.84 t | 1,284 t | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 535.82 t | 113.05 t | 422.77 t | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 127.08 t | 101.52 t | 25.56 t | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Montenegro or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Montenegro, at 131.16 t against 90.39 t in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 40.77 t, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Montenegro ranks 163rd and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 166th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).