Myanmar vs Uzbekistan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Myanmar
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 436,360 t against 414,728 t in Uzbekistan, a difference of 21,632 t.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.1 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Myanmar ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Uzbekistan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Myanmar | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 228,566 t | 287,648 t | 59,082 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 291,673 t | 344,240 t | 52,567 t | Uzbekistan |
| 2010s | 374,293 t | 356,301 t | 17,992 t | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 426,838 t | 387,849 t | 38,989 t | Myanmar |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Myanmar or Uzbekistan?
- Myanmar, at 436,360 t against 414,728 t in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Myanmar and Uzbekistan?
- 21,632 t, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Myanmar and Uzbekistan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Myanmar ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 23rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).