North Macedonia vs Uruguay: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- North Macedonia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 7,795 t against 6,396 t in North Macedonia, a difference of 1,399 t.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times North Macedonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uruguay ahead.
North Macedonia ranks 126th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,238 t | 14,781 t | 3,543 t | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 8,870 t | 11,251 t | 2,381 t | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 7,557 t | 10,657 t | 3,100 t | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 6,680 t | 9,782 t | 3,102 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, North Macedonia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 7,795 t against 6,396 t in North Macedonia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 1,399 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do North Macedonia and Uruguay rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- North Macedonia ranks 126th and Uruguay ranks 123rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).