Norway vs South Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Norway
- South Sudan
How they compare
Norway currently reports 25,737 t against 25,529 t in South Sudan, a difference of 208 t.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Norway has been ahead every year.
Norway ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 38,039 t | 22,731 t | 15,308 t | Norway |
| 2020s | 38,010 t | 23,299 t | 14,711 t | Norway |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Norway or South Sudan?
- Norway, at 25,737 t against 25,529 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Norway and South Sudan?
- 208 t, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Norway and South Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Norway ranks 97th and South Sudan ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).