Panama vs Slovenia: Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium over time
- Panama
- Slovenia
How they compare
Panama currently reports 10,391 t against 9,566 t in Slovenia, a difference of 825 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Slovenia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 117th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 186 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11,708 t | 6,939 t | 4,769 t | Panama |
| 2000s | 11,076 t | 7,339 t | 3,737 t | Panama |
| 2010s | 10,093 t | 9,446 t | 646.48 t | Panama |
| 2020s | 10,252 t | 9,826 t | 425.91 t | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal β cropland potassium, Panama or Slovenia?
- Panama, at 10,391 t against 9,566 t in Slovenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal β cropland potassium between Panama and Slovenia?
- 825 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Panama and Slovenia rank globally for crop residue removal β cropland potassium?
- Panama ranks 117th and Slovenia ranks 119th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal β Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).