Polynesia vs Vanuatu: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Polynesia
- Vanuatu
How they compare
Vanuatu currently reports 348.32 t against 318.9 t in Polynesia, a difference of 29.42 t.
That makes Vanuatu's figure about 1.1 times Polynesia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Polynesia ahead.
Polynesia ranks 171st and Vanuatu ranks 169th of 201 countries.
Polynesia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Polynesia | Vanuatu | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 398.22 t | 51.12 t | 347.1 t | Polynesia |
| 1970s | 351.86 t | 80.03 t | 271.83 t | Polynesia |
| 1980s | 353.74 t | 136.76 t | 216.98 t | Polynesia |
| 1990s | 266.33 t | 175.49 t | 90.84 t | Polynesia |
| 2000s | 255.18 t | 217.08 t | 38.11 t | Polynesia |
| 2010s | 347.1 t | 247.74 t | 99.36 t | Polynesia |
| 2020s | 325.83 t | 309.04 t | 16.79 t | Polynesia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Polynesia or Vanuatu?
- Vanuatu, at 348.32 t against 318.9 t in Polynesia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Polynesia and Vanuatu?
- 29.42 t, with Vanuatu ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Polynesia and Vanuatu?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Polynesia and Vanuatu rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Polynesia ranks 171st and Vanuatu ranks 169th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).