Republic of Korea vs Slovakia: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Republic of Korea
- Slovakia
How they compare
Slovakia currently reports 143,677 t against 143,252 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 425 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Republic of Korea ahead.
Republic of Korea ranks 52nd and Slovakia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
Republic of Korea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Republic of Korea | Slovakia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 181,849 t | 104,941 t | 76,909 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 171,785 t | 77,347 t | 94,437 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 154,788 t | 96,627 t | 58,161 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2020s | 145,538 t | 128,382 t | 17,157 t | Republic of Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Republic of Korea or Slovakia?
- Slovakia, at 143,677 t against 143,252 t in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Republic of Korea and Slovakia?
- 425 t, with Slovakia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Republic of Korea and Slovakia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Republic of Korea and Slovakia rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Republic of Korea ranks 52nd and Slovakia ranks 51st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).