Saudi Arabia vs Sudan: Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium
Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 106,680 t against 100,461 t in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 6,219 t.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.1 times Saudi Arabia's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Sudan has been ahead every year.
Saudi Arabia ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 58th of 186 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 107,635 t | 145,454 t | 37,819 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 90,763 t | 124,251 t | 33,489 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher crop residue removal — cropland potassium, Saudi Arabia or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 106,680 t against 100,461 t in Saudi Arabia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in crop residue removal — cropland potassium between Saudi Arabia and Sudan?
- 6,219 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Sudan rank globally for crop residue removal — cropland potassium?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 60th and Sudan ranks 58th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Crop residue removal — Cropland potassium. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).